Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Comparing Poems Essay (edited)

Love is an eternal , loving feeling that is had for another person. However, there is a debate between the honest validity of that emotion. In John Donne’s “A Valediction” his feelings for the girl that he loves are as strong as cupid’s arrows. They are connected through their souls instead of just by looks, or amounts of money. On the other hand, Judith Minty’s “Conjoined” has a much more negative stand point on love. She doesn’t believe that any person would honestly want to be connected to another person, so completely, for the entirety of said person’s life. While both author's use similar figurative language( like onomatopoeia, personification, etc.) to establish the meanings of their poems, they offer very contrasting views of love.
Donne commits to his other-worldly theme with words like “whisper,” “souls to go,” and “breath.” These words have a calm and peaceful feeling about them. The speaker does not fear death, but instead sees it as a kind of peaceful release. We are comforted by the fact that they left quietly. The souls of two lovers are also onomatopoeias and personified. They are quiet, soft, and linger between the lines. They describe that when a great man dies his soul stays behind. Even though his body is gone his soul stays on earth, the love he feels for this other person keeps his soul alive to live on passed his death. This gives the man spiritual form that seems to radiate positive, loving energy.
The use of repetition and hyperbole in “A Valediction” reflects the love of a man who is very much so on earth, in body and mind. “Sigh-tempests” is repetitive and reflects that belief that a common man’s love is superficial. There is no real contact between the two lovers, no deeper meaning to their love. Their relationship is routine and therefore boring. The couple gets used to one another, to the point where they just want to escape each other. There is no more spark or spontaneity to keep the fire that is his or her love burning. A common man’s love is just a routine of superficial sweets. He is unable to actually live in love and engage in new experiences everyday. The hyperbole “tear-floods” explains that the tears flow like floods. A soul of a lover is imperfect and his love is painful. It insinuates that a relationship with a man of the earth is destined for unhappiness.
Donne makes apparent comparisons within the lines of his poem. For example, “Moving of the earth brings harms and fears” and the contrasting “But trepidation of the spheres.” The earth is concrete. A relationship on earth is unstable and disconcerting. The earth is organic and concrete, so the love on the earth is all man-made. Men on the earth are fallible. They make mistakes, harm others, and have inhibiting emotions and fears. Donne compares that with “trepidation of the spheres” which alludes to something spiritual. The spheres are not of this earth, it’s all abstract and intangible. When souls do not come together no one can be blamed. A human is not at fault, it is rather the fact that the universe did not allow the two souls to be aligned. Repetition is used again in stanza 7 with the words, “they,” “two,” and “foot.” It reads,”If they be two, they are two so. As stiff twin compasses are two; thy soul, the fixt foot, makes no show to move, but doth, if th’other do.” It emphasizes that fact that a relationship is between two people happens to the fullest extent when they unifying as one. The stanza is also a metaphor and illustrates that both partners have work together like two feet. If one foot goes the other has to follow, and this cannot be done if the two are not in agreement. The concept of walking cannot be successful if one foot moves and the other doesn’t. The whole cannot continue on without it’s other parts. She is the other foot; she completes him.
Minty’s “Conjoined” has a significantly different view on marriage than Donne’s “A Valediction.” Minty uses words like “monsters,” “accident,” and “freaks” that have negative connotations to mirror the negative feeling she has towards marriage. She believes that marriage is unnatural and horrific. Marriage is unfortunate like a freak and destructive like a monster. These three words also create an illusion of a mad-scientist project gone wrong. A scientist invented this concept but during creation, something went wrong and this accident created a monster. Also, Minty uses a simile to compare marriage to Siamese twins. Like Siamese twins, marriage is an indefinite connection to someone. You have to live and work with someone forever and there is no escape. You will always have someone behind you, impairing you, inhibiting you from living a life on your own will. She says, “Do you feel the skin that binds us together as we move, heavy in this house?” Marriage is the skin the binds the two together. But it is a burden and weighs them down. With this skin connecting them, there is no individuality. They ultimately become one person doomed to live as one for the rest of their life. An onion is also used as a symbol. Minty states that the “onion in my cupboard, a monster…each half-round, then flat and deformed where it pressed and grew against the other.” The individual onion was normal, but then grew against the other and became deformed. The individual onion was transformed into this bulbous, hideous onion. The onion reflects the idea that growing against another person in marriage will deform a person.
The two very different authors use a lot of figurative language to establish two completely different points of view. Donne feels that his love is special, greater than a common man’s love because it is a spiritual connection of love, while Minty disagrees with the concept of marriage and gets tired of being with the same person all the time, even though he or she does love that person in some way. Figurative language unfolds the differing attitudes and juxtaposes an optimistic outlook with a negative one.

4 comments:

  1. The essay's thesis is fairly obvious, which to be "obvious" is a great thing. At first i was a bit confused at where you were going, from your opening lines, however you tied it correctly in the direction you wanted to lead the reader. Last note " Love is an eternal , loving feeling" doesn't make too much sense to describe love as a "loving feeling".... an analogy describing chocolate as chocolaty.(just nit picking.) Another thing I like about the intro is you don't narrow down what you are going to use just leave it as "figurative language" i dont know if this is bad but it seems as we have been taught to churn out these "Thesis 1,2,and 3 things i will describe about my thesis". Something to think about is your thesis seems to be maybe lacking of much of an argument.
    You do a great job of providing evidence to support your claims. Using both direct and indirect quoting(i think) is great.
    You do explain these quote however at some points it may seem a bit over analyzed in a sense just completely drain the quotes of their meanings because their so "explained".
    You do analyze how literary devices tie back to the thesis. However towards the end it seems to be a little more "out of wack" the essay seems to drift from thesis, a bit..
    The essay is written very well and seem to be no misinterpretations.
    1. Take a look at your thesis and intro, is this all necesarry? Could you possibly state this in a more, direct fashion?
    2. Looking at "Conjoined" portion of your essay, could you change this to be more convincing?
    3.In your conclusion, it seems to be more of a duplication of the intro rather than a "this is what i proved" possibly look into that
    4. Do you feel as if you made apparent the comparing and contrasting of the figurative language each author used?

    ReplyDelete
  2. PROS: good organization, each paragraph was clealy defined and had a specific role in proving the thesis and prompt.
    thesis was clear
    nice vocabulary :)
    Pavin said to mention specific figuartive devices in the thesis but i think by stating which devices in the beginning of your paragraph made the essay less repetitive and held a good structure so it wasnt an issue for me :/
    CONS: When i first read it i was gonna say you kinda repeated yourself alot in the first few paragraphs. idk i got a lil bored. But i read it again to show you which par. it was, and when i read it the second time it didn't have the same effect. Pavin said the a similar thing too but i don't think it was over-explained like i did at first, i think it's because the thesis wasn't really an arguement and i just got bored with the explaination of an obvious thesis. So it was good but thats something that can be improved. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, lets start off with how this essay started. I really like the intro and the fact that it was very straight forward and it got to the point. Kudos to you!And yeah, i like your first sentence and how it joined forces with the rest of your Intro. Nice job. and your little description about the poems were short and quick. and nice job with the thesis. it was very simple just like mine. so the body paragraph was fine. you discussed about the two poems and you did very well.

    Nice job in the end. the ending sentence made a good point. so good. and the only thing which i disliked was that i couldn't tell if it was a new paragraph or not. that's the only thing. besides that it was great. i hope you enjoy reading this.

    questions? nah, no questions from me

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pavin said that I need to go back to my intro and thesis and discuss them in a more direct way, like get to the point I guess. He also said that I explained the evidence I used from the novel too much to the point where it would strip the example of its use. Janissa agreed with Pavin in a few parts, but also disagreed. She actually liked my explanation, and just thought I should make an argument out of my thesis, which I agree whole-heartedly with. And, as usual, sweet Jim just praised what I wrote.
    What I need to go improve is my thesis, and maybe even my intro, condense the intro and make an argument in my thesis. I also need to go through my paragraphs and make sure I am not over explaining my evidence so they don't lose their effects. I also need to go to my conclusion and state what I accomplished in my essay. Otherwise I was proud of what I wrote.

    ReplyDelete